Sherman
Alexie’s novel, “The Lone Ranger and Tonto Fistfight in Heaven”, according to
Alexie the writing style is characterized as “reservation realism”, the truth
of life on the reservation as Alexie views it, which is evident in the school year short stories. These short stories compare greatly to the
reservation boarding schools during the mid 1900’s which Alexie, the author,
attended as a child. This shows that
Alexie takes from really facts of life on the reservation, whether their his
experiences or others that he has see or hear of, and creates this novel of
realistic life of the reservation as a whole.
After looking up reservation
boarding schools in the 1900’s, I found many comparisons to the second grade
year in the “Indian Education” chapter of the novel. During the mid 1900’s, the
first reservation boarding schools were “first established by (white) Christian
missionaries” whose goal was to teach “Euro- American standards” to the (who
they viewed as) uncivilized, sinful Indians (Wikipedia). The purpose of the reservation boarding
schools was to civilize these Indians into well-off educated American
individuals. This American reservation
history directly aligns with the description of the student’s second grade
classroom experience in the novel. The
Indian student had a missionary teacher, named Betty Towle, who was a white
American placed in this classroom to civilize her Indian students (Alexie, 172). There was a clear discrimination towards the
Native American students in her classroom.
This is shown when she does not call the Indian narrator by name but as
Indian. She did not view them as equals
but as a non-superior savage race in need of civilization. This view was characterized through her
actions and how she treated the Native American students. When the teacher had her student eat his/her
spelling test after getting all the questions right shows that she did not care
for her students like a normal teacher would but views them as a problem and in
need of refining. Even after they accomplished
what she was there to do, give them an education which is shown through the
100% on a spelling test, the teacher responds by not praising the student but
by putting them in their lower social place by having the student eat their
test. Clearly, the historical
reservation life was a lot like the short story expressed in Alexie’s novel. The students were discriminated against and
viewed by these teachers as a problem that needs to be taught how to act
“white” because that the civilized way.
In the novel, Alexie also describes an
Indian boy (who could have been made around experiences Alexie himself experienced
or a character established around the lives of other people on his reservation)
who was forced to leave his family and go to a reservation boarding
school. That short story narrator,
described his experience as “saying good-bye to the (his) tribe, to all the
Indian girls and women (he) might have loved, to all the Indian men who might
have called (him) cousin, even brother”(Alexie, 176).
This experience explained fits many of the situations experienced by
Indians in the mid 1900’s. Research
showed that “boarding school attendance was mandatory”, forcing the children to
be removed from their Indian family and required to say good-bye to their life
on the reservation, just like the boy explained in the novel (Un. of Minn).
Another similarity of realistic events
and the stories in the novel is found in the returning of the students once
they have completed their education.
After being away from their reservation lifestyles for year and forced
to conform to the Euro-American standards the children are “shaken and
frightened because they don’t know what comes next”(Alexie, 180). Like Indians in real reservations, these
characters are forced to return to a life they were forced to forget. The white Americans “civilize” them by
suppressing all the elements of their Indian life then place them back to a
world they no longer belong in (Wikipedia).
All of these factors create
“Reservation Realism” because the facts are real, not by one person in particular
but as the reservation as a whole. They
are one in their culture and traditions which is why they are characterized and
identified as one in the novel. These
stories may not be events experienced by one person but they are stories that
are part of the reservation. This
writing style expresses the typical lives of Indians as a whole. They are discriminated against as one
throughout history so their stories in this novel are narrated as one. I view “Reservation Realism” as the
stories/facts of the whole Indian Reservation group which is frequent
throughout Alexie’s novel.
Work Cited:
·
.
"Brief History of Amercian Indian History." Exploring the Circle.
Regents of University of Minnesota, 09 25 2012. Web. 30 Sep 2012.
<http://etc.umn.edu/resources/briefhistory.htm>.
·
.
"Sherman Alexie." Wikipedia. N.p., 09 29 2012. Web. 30 Sep
2012. <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sherman_Alexie>.
·
.
"Wikipedia." Native American boarding school. N.p., 09 27
2012. Web. 30 Sep 2012.
<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Native_American_boarding_schools>.
While I was researching American Indian boarding schools, I came across a website that I found really interesting. Many of these schools would take before and after professional portraits of their students; after looking at it for a while I realized that the skin color of the students had changed. The photographers were hired to use special techniques (which it explains on the website) to wash out or darken a photo. This shows how the schools were making the Indians white, socially but also physically through their portraits.
ReplyDeleteLink: http://www.californiaindianeducation.org/indian_boarding_schools/
Brandi, I really enjoyed reading your post and learning more about the boarding schools the Native American children attended. Your comparisons to the Indian Education chapter out of Alexie’s book and your research on the boarding schools made your definition of “reservation realism” that much stronger. You mention at the end of your response that “reservation realism” refers to “stories/facts of the whole Indian Reservation.” Do you think it is possible that some of Alexie’s stories are about one particular person rather than the whole Indian Reservation? For example, is it possible that Alexie wrote Flight for John-John or does your definition of “reservation realism” hold true for even these types of stories?
ReplyDeleteKelly, I feel that if the stories were only regarding one person and had no connection to the entire tribe then the novel would have classified as non-fiction. Since it is a fiction novel, there has to be some underlining meaning to the stories about not just one person in particular. This is why I viewed the "reservation realism" as a way to tell the story of a whole group, in the case the tribe, using fictional stories about experiences that have happened in the history of the whole reservation.
DeleteKelly, I think Alexie's point is that even if something happened to just one person, it still affected the entire reservation. For example, even if the events in Flight only happened to John-John, it still affects the reservation because they all have to live with it. The reservation seems to me like a huge, dysfunctional family. If something, whether it's good or bad, occurs to a family member, it's going to affect the entire family. That's just what I got from the readings. What do you guys think?
ReplyDeleteBrandi, I like how you pointed out how the teacher just classified her Native American students as Indians instead of individuals. I think this is also brought to the readers attention at the end where the narrator graduates valedictorian but is placed among other Indians who cannot even read or write. How do you think individuality can be reached when others see you as only a part of a group?
ReplyDeleteLydia, I believe that individuality can be reached when you as an individual do something out of the stereotypical view that society has placed you in. In the example you gave, Native American students are not viewed as smart and especially not the valedictorian. By individuals working against the odds can establish themselves as not only a part of the group but also an individual. The teachers can no longer view the narrator as part of the stereotype when they beat the odds and separate themselves from the group. How do some of you think people can show that they are not part of a stereotype?
ReplyDelete